The Reform Agenda · Layer 2 of three · what should happen · site record current through

The Reform Agenda

The record says what changed. This says what is wrong with it, what should replace it, and in what words — drafted so a legislator, a regulator or a board could use it, and labelled so nobody could mistake it for law.

Representative illustration: a clinician holding a tablet beside an open bank of case files, looking out over a lit route marked with stages for care, coverage and oversight. No real people, institutions or events are depicted.
Representative illustration · not real people, institutions or events.

New · 31 August 2026

Legislator Briefs

Every published proposal now also exists as a one-page brief for a legislative or agency office: issue, current law, policy gap, recommendation, who has authority to act, cost, stakeholder effect, a trade-off matrix, four policy options with the preferred one marked, success metrics, the five-physician-practice test, and the next decision point. Print-clean, and labelled as a proposal on every surface.

All 9 briefsA brief exists only where a full proposal is already published.

Three layers, and the rule that keeps them apart

1 · The record

What happened

Primary authority, one lifecycle state per record. Unchanged and still the foundation: the desk, enforcement, litigation, legislation.

2 · The reform agenda

What should happen

KPSGILL positions, model statutory and regulatory language, model board guidance, comment proposals, litigation questions. Labelled as proposals on every surface.

3 · The future of medicine

What is likely to happen

Forecasts and scenarios, each with stated confidence, stated assumptions, and a competing scenario. A forecast without a competing scenario is a defect.

The publication spent its first stage answering one question well: what changed, stated exactly, with the instrument and the primary source. That function does not move. What is added here is the second and third question — what is structurally wrong, and what should replace it — carried in objects that can never be mistaken for a statement of law.

The discipline is the same one the record layer already runs on. A proposal names the problem, cites the documentary baseline it rests on, states the recommendation, drafts the actual language, and then states the strongest argument against itself. A proposal with no opposition section is unfinished, not persuasive.

The agenda, by domain

What is published now

Swipe the table sideways for the remaining columns

18 normative objects, each anchored to records already in the documentary layer
LabelObjectDomainStatus
MODEL LEGISLATIONModel AI Medical Record Integrity Standard · BriefArtificial intelligence & medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL LEGISLATIONParallel Certification Recognition Act, and the competition question underneath it · BriefCertification & credentialingOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
KPSGILL REFORM POSITIONLiability should follow control: allocating responsibility for AI-assisted clinical decisionsProfessional liabilityOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL MEDICAL BOARD GUIDANCEModel board guidance: when AI use becomes a disciplinary questionMedical board reformOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL CMS POLICYA prospective primary-care payment design worth commenting onPrimary careOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
FUTURE-OF-MEDICINE FORECASTForecast: the first AI-adjacent board discipline cases arrive before the guidance doesFuture of medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL PAYER STANDARDPrior authorization: a duration floor and a named decision-maker · BriefPayer & prior authorizationOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL REGULATIONCorporate control of clinical judgement: naming the levers · BriefPhysician independence & ownershipOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL CMS POLICYLaboratory quality as payment integrity · BriefDrug & device regulationOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
EVIDENCE GAPCoverage architecture: an evidence gap, not a positionHealthcare financing & coverageNO POSITION TAKEN
MODEL LEGISLATIONPhysician payment: fix the update, then fix the redistribution · BriefPhysician paymentOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL LEGISLATIONMedical board process: the decisive moments happen before the accusation · BriefMedical board reformOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
LITIGATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSISLitigation feasibility: challenging an algorithmic coverage denialLitigation & courtsOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL LEGISLATIONHealth data outside HIPAA: a duty attached to the data, not the holder · BriefHealth data & digital medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
MODEL LEGISLATIONEmergency powers that expire, and a state determination that is not a foreign one · BriefPublic healthOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
FUTURE-OF-MEDICINE FORECASTAutomation disclosure arrives through metrics, not through a prohibitionFuture of medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
FUTURE-OF-MEDICINE FORECASTContinuing certification is unbundled by purchasers, not by regulatorsFuture of medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE
FUTURE-OF-MEDICINE FORECASTProvenance becomes a certification requirement, and the attestation problem is solved sidewaysFuture of medicineOPEN FOR CRITIQUE

The Policy Lab holds the template every one of these is built on, and the queue of domains where the documentary record is strong enough to support a position but none has been drafted yet.