Original datasets, trackers and indexes · 13 published · 4 held · site record current through 8 September 2026

Research products

Datasets and trackers KPSGILL builds rather than reports. Each is generated from a registry, carries its own methodology, and states what it does not establish. The second half of this page is the more useful half: the products deliberately not published, and why.

Representative illustration: a physician-researcher at dual monitors showing coded records and a relationship graph. The person and institution shown are not real. — Representative illustration · not real people, institutions or events.

The research program

What this institute intends to investigate next, and why it is moving from explaining the machinery to measuring what the machinery produces. One hundred and thirty questions in twelve clusters, each stated as a question a public record can answer, each carrying a PROPOSED state until its record set can carry an answer.

Published · active research · California Medical Discipline Observatory

California Medical Board DUI Discipline Registry, 2011–2026

A matter-level historical reconstruction linking the Board’s published dispositions to accusations, action alerts and underlying disciplinary documents. Historical completeness is measured period by period rather than assumed from the current online search interface.

Why can an apparently similar off-duty alcohol-related event result in a public reprimand for one California physician and years of monitored probation for another?

Not an accusation of arbitrariness — a question the published record can be made to answer, by coding charge selection, findings, representation, procedural route, the evidence that actually reached the decision-maker, and the reasoning given for any departure from the published range.

Read the investigation Explore the registry Read the methodology

the research program · the program record

Published

Original dataset · matter-levelCalifornia Medical Board DUI Discipline Registry, 2011–2026A working matter-level registry built from the Board’s own published registers, historical action alerts and underlying disciplinary documents. Source observations and unique matters are kept separate so verification never becomes double counting. Completeness is stated period by period; only January–March 2025 is bounded-complete.Open →Comparative datasetRural Health Transformation spending matrixWhat each state is actually buying under the CMS programme, by category, with the outcome-metric column that is empty for every award to date.Open →TimelineHealth-System Event Timeline147 verified dated records, newest first, each populating its jurisdiction, topic and record page from one entry.Open →TrackerDecision calendarHearings, votes, comment deadlines and effective dates, computed from stated closing instants rather than typed.Open →TrackerCalifornia Governor’s Health Bill DeskEvery tracked 2026 health measure with its enrolment state, presentment time, per-bill deadline and verification state.Open →TrackerGlobal regulatory operations registerRegulatory movement outside U.S. enforcement, typed by action and legal effect so a meeting is never filed as a rule.Open →IndexForecast ledgerFour active forecasts with confidence, assumptions, competing scenario and falsification condition. Resolved forecasts are scored, never deleted.Open →TrackerCalifornia legislative tracker14 measures with per-bill verification state and full chamber histories.Open →Comparative datasetAI specialty impact atlasSpecialty-level analysis of clinical AI exposure.Open →TrackerMedi-Cal change ledgerDated Medi-Cal changes with the instrument named.Open →TrackerLitigation docketTracked healthcare litigation.Open →TrackerOutbreak state mapOutbreak state, PHEIC state, countermeasure and recommendation held as separate fields.Open →Tracker2027 IMG Match DeskEvery ERAS, ECFMG, NRMP and immigration date in the cycle with its authority and stated instant.Open →

Designed, and deliberately not published

METHODOLOGY DRAFTED · NOT PUBLISHED

KPSGILL Physician Autonomy Index

Scores every state on corporate-practice protection, noncompete enforceability, independent-judgement protection, peer-review due process, PHP safeguards, NPDB consequences, scope environment and payer interference.

Why it is held: Methodology drafted. NO SCORES PUBLISHED. Publishing a number for fifty states requires the fifty-state statutory research to exist first, and it does not. A composite score built on partial research would be the most citable and least defensible thing on this site.

METHODOLOGY DRAFTED · NOT PUBLISHED

KPSGILL Healthcare Administrative Burden Index

Measures prior authorisation, credentialing, documentation, quality reporting, payer enrolment, licensing and certification load by state, payer and system.

Why it is held: Methodology drafted. NO SCORES PUBLISHED. The binding gap is measurement: this site has no primary data on credentialing delay or documentation time, and an index without measured inputs is an opinion with decimal places.

METHODOLOGY DRAFTED · NOT PUBLISHED

KPSGILL Medical Regulatory Due Process Index

Compares medical boards on notice, investigation authority, expert review, access to evidence, discovery, hearing procedure, evidentiary burden, interim action, publication, appeal and PHP relationship.

Why it is held: Methodology drafted, and the California dimension is substantially researched in the due-process proposal. NO SCORES PUBLISHED — a comparative index needs the other 49 boards read to the same standard.

METHODOLOGY DRAFTED · NOT PUBLISHED

KPSGILL Corporate Medicine Map

Hospital-system footprints, private-equity-backed physician organisations, MSOs, insurers, PBMs, staffing companies and nursing-home ownership, with followable ownership chains.

Why it is held: NOT BUILT. Depends on the ownership database, which requires corporate, SEC, regulatory and transaction sourcing per entity. A speculative ownership chain is worse than no map.

The data layer

Every figure on this site is computed from one record rather than typed, and each figure states the universe it counts. This is deliberate: a reader who doubts a number can see the universe and denominator stated beside it.

The publicly fetchable registries every figure on this site is computed from. A reader who doubts a number can read the file it came from.
Registry	What it holds
`counts.json`	Every corpus figure the site displays, with a published definition per figure
`chronology-2026.json`	The dated record — 147 verified developments
`events.json`	Event records with establishes / does-not-establish
`ca-bills.json`	California bill registry, session-scoped, with verification state per bill
`deadlines.json`	Date objects with stated closing instants where authorities give them
`proposals.json`	KPSGILL proposals, forecasts and legislator briefs
`graph.json`	The relationship graph — 286 edges, each carrying the registry that asserts it
`entities-registry.json`	Stable entity IDs — 38 registered
`object-taxonomy.json`	The 23 first-class object types and their real status
`schemas.json`	Metadata contract, claim classification, source hierarchy, freshness tiers
`supersessions.json`	Every superseded URL and its successor
`img-cycle.json`	The 2027 Match cycle and its immigration dates
`img-visa.json`	Physician immigration: statute, regulation, guidance, proposed rule and litigation, each dated
`rhtp.json`	Rural Health Transformation state awards by funded category
`snapshots.json`	The ordered register of publication snapshots

How this is sourced and verified · The event timeline · Editorial standards