Start here · Perspective
Attorneys & Legal Teams
For plaintiff, defense, government and in-house counsel and their teams. Every reader receives the same evidence, limitations and contrary material; nothing here is arranged for one side.
A perspective is a reading interest, not an identity check, an access level or a judgement of anyone’s expertise. It changes what is shown first, never what the evidence says: every reader reaches the same articles, findings, limitations and contrary material, and every page stays open to everyone. Choosing a perspective saves nothing on your device and is not sent to any analytics or advertising service.
Start with a task
Malpractice and wrongful death
Correctional healthcare and civil-rights research
CFMG–Wellpath entities, contracts and records
Employment, benefits and professional governance
Clinical AI and EHR evidence
Five places to start
Chosen for this perspective. Titles, dates and review notes are the pages’ own.
- Evaluating a California Malpractice Case From Both Sides
Evaluating a California malpractice case from either side.
- CFMG & Wellpath in California
The documentary investigation, its 100 articles and its source register.
- The Medical Record Has More Than One Clock
Separating event, entry, result and action in a record.
- Litigation docket: what a court has actually decided
Cases that decide how medicine is governed, and what each has decided.
- Separate What an EHR Recorded From What a Clinician Could Know
What an EHR recorded, versus what a clinician could know.
Read the research, or explore an engagement
Read the research
Everything on this page is public reading. It is the same for plaintiff, defense and government readers, and using it creates no professional relationship.
Explore an engagement
Expert medical review and consulting is a separate service. Whether review or testimony is possible depends on qualifications, scope, conflicts, the record and engagement terms; nothing here promises acceptance of a matter, admissibility, a particular opinion or an outcome. Publishing the CFMG–Wellpath research is not an offer of engagement in related matters: under the published independence policy, matters involving Dr. Gill’s current or former employers, their affiliates or contractors, or any organization with which he has a pending or past dispute, are declined.
How the review works · Qualifications · Independence and conflict screening · Request a scope discussion (non-clinical first message; no records at inquiry)
Technology and intellectual-property counsel: the material here addresses clinical use, documentation, workflow, intended function, human oversight and patient safety. It does not offer patent, infringement or validity opinions, source-code analysis or software forensics, and a clinical critique is not an engineering or patent-law opinion. The guide to choosing reviewers by the question they must answer explains when another discipline is needed.
Where to verify
Source records, methods, and limiting or contrary material.
Recent changes in this area
First publications and substantive revisions in the last 45 days, newest first, by each page’s own content date — never the date this page was rebuilt.
- Wrongful death and survival claims are different claims
- Worksheets for Case Review and Safer Practice
- Special settings: identify the legal pathway before filing
- A Physician's Response to an Adverse Event, Claim or Board Inquiry
- Getting and keeping medical records: access, retention and spoliation
- Preventing Harm Through Reliable Clinical Workflows
Scope of this page
- The malpractice section explains California law. It is not a guide to other states’ rules, and none of it calculates a deadline for a particular matter.
- General information, not individual medical, legal or financial advice. See the medical and legal disclaimer.
- How sources, claims, dates and corrections are handled: Methodology and Editorial standards.
- Expert medical review and clinical consulting are separate professional services with their own qualifications and independence and conflict rules. Reading this site is not an engagement.
Related perspectives
Printed from https://kpsgill.com/start/attorneys-legal-teams/. Dates are each linked page’s own content dates; check the page itself for its current version.