National Watch · 12 November 2026 · 15-day reconciliation, 29 October – 12 November
CFMG–Wellpath National Watch: Payments Mailed, Pleadings Moving, and the Limits of the Record
A confirmed Monterey distribution and two new pleading schedules change the public record. The legal entities, requested relief and unanswered questions remain distinct.
The newest public records move the CFMG–Wellpath investigation forward in different ways: an administrator reports a completed mailing, courts set pleading dates, a new case names CFMG and Wellpath LLC separately, and bankruptcy indexes list insurance filings whose contents are still unread. This page is the canonical record of those changes, each with its evidence grade. Nothing here is a finding that any company or person acted unlawfully.
Added 13 November 2026
Follow-up: records obtained on 13 November
Several records this page graded C were found and read a day later — the Angelo orders and reply, the Goss and Montes Zepeda orders and the Trust's tolling order. The briefs below keep their 12 November grades; the follow-up sets out what the text shows and what is still unread.
The watch
The newest public records move several parts of the CFMG–Wellpath investigation forward, but they do not move them in the same way. A settlement administrator reports a completed mailing. Two California courts set pleading deadlines. Bankruptcy indexes identify additional insurance and claims filings whose substance still requires examination. Those changes belong in one dated watch, with the type of evidence visible beside each item.
In Monterey, the Hernandez settlement administrator's November 9 notice confirms that the second distribution was mailed on November 4. It gives February 2, 2027 as the date after which those checks become void. The September 15 distribution remains a separate group, with checks void after December 14, 2026. The administrator directs people with an unreported address change to contact it. This is confirmation of mailing, not confirmation that every intended recipient received or deposited a payment. The April 20, 2026 deadline for timely claims has already passed. [1]
This resolves a specific uncertainty in the investigation's November 1 edition, which recorded the second distribution as anticipated. The earlier notice remains useful history because it shows what was known at that time. A later confirmation belongs above it, linked to the administrator, rather than silently changing a prospective statement into an apparent contemporaneous fact. Readers checking a payment need the notice for their own distribution; merging the dates could misdirect them.
Two other developments concern the next pleadings. In Nava v. County of Calaveras, a November 2 order permits an amended complaint adding Xavier Nava as a plaintiff and gives the named CFMG defendants through November 13 to respond. The stipulation preserves their defenses. In Cheslik v. Madera County Sheriff's Department, a November 6 order extends Wellpath LLC's response deadline to December 4. Neither order adjudicates the underlying medical-care allegations. [2, 3]
Their different entity designations matter. A case involving California Forensic Medical Group should not be reported as though every act was performed by any company using the Wellpath brand. Conversely, a pleading naming Wellpath LLC should not automatically be relabeled CFMG because the events occurred in California. The appropriate starting point is the operative complaint, appearance, order and contract for that particular case, followed by the evidence that connects a particular legal entity to a particular function.
The existing Overfield analysis remains an important part of that discipline. The October 30 order granted CFMG protection from the disputed financial discovery. It did not decide whether a management arrangement violated California's corporate-practice or fee-splitting rules. Descriptions of organizational testimony in a party's filing remain attributed accounts unless the testimony itself has been obtained and checked in context. [4]
A defensible control analysis asks more than where money moved. What agreement authorized a decision? Who could reverse it? Who selected or removed the physician decision-maker? What did the physician corporation actually retain the power to do? Documents answering those questions could support, limit or contradict an initial inference. The investigation should publish the counterevidence with the same prominence as the evidence favoring its working hypothesis.
The national bankruptcy watch also has new entries. Public indexes of the continuing Wellpath SF Holdco case identify November 9 filings concerning the Angelo insurance dispute and claims objections, and a November 11 motion by Amanda Dunkley concerning insurance proceeds. The new underlying papers were not available for full review in this edition. The supported statement is that these filings are indexed. No entitlement to insurance, coverage finding, new claim disallowance or victory for either side is reported here. [5, 6]
That distinction is useful to claimants and practitioners. A motion describes requested relief; a response states an opposing position; a declaration supplies evidence from its author; an order decides the matter it addresses. A seal order, in particular, does not reveal the substance of sealed insurance terms or settle the merits of coverage. The next update should identify the precise order, parties and relief before explaining practical consequences.
Other investigations remain open without a verified new outcome. The Hall public repository still ends its listed enforcement-motion papers with the September reply. A newer order was not established in this review. A public feed identifies later activity in Montes Zepeda, including an answer, but the underlying record must be read to resolve the precise claim-by-claim procedural history. Neither repository silence nor a short feed label answers every status question. [7, 8]
This edition therefore advances what the evidence supports: an actual mailing, new pleading dates, and specific filings to obtain. The larger research question remains who exercised authority, under which instrument, during which period, and with what consequence for care. That question becomes stronger when each conclusion can be traced back to a document and revised when the next document changes the account.
How to read the grades
- A — Actual primary document text examined; mirrored court orders remain primary documents.
- B — Official administrative or court-register information, limited to what the register or administrator says.
- C — Third-party docket or court-feed reproduction: the filing or order exists in the index; its unseen contents and the complete current status are not inferred.
- D — Secondary lead or tentative reproduction: original records are needed before stronger publication.
- H — Earlier-source acquisition target not re-opened in this review: provenance kept, substantive claims held.
Twenty-six record briefs follow. They are not twenty-six active lawsuits: they include contracts, a regulation, a financial disclosure, historical comparators, unresolved leads and three contested matters inside one bankruptcy. No event is an automatic current-active-company count, and no national docket census is claimed.
Corrections before this record is reused
- Montes Zepeda. The 7 October dismissal (ECF 80) stays as a historical event, but later activity — 21 October reopening/minute entries, answers on 22 October (ECF 85) and 10 November (ECF 87), and an extension signed 22 October (ECF 86) — means current status must be reconciled claim by claim and defendant by defendant. No vacatur or reinstatement is claimed without the minute orders. Record.
- Goss. The acquisition queue now runs through ECF 83 (11 November), labelled an order adding and terminating parties. The label does not say which party; no company is marked dismissed or active from it. Record.
- Hill. The 5 November ruling denying interim injunctive relief (ECF 39) followed the earlier dismissal of the claim against Wellpath Medical Corporation (recounted in ECF 31, 30 June). It is not evidence of continuing litigation against a Wellpath corporate defendant. Record.
- Watson. The official 11 May order names New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C. and the Wellpath Liquidating Trust separately. The denied motion was the county's and officers', not theirs. A historical comparator, not a November ruling. Record.
- SEC measurements. Prospect Capital's 30 September values (Form 10-Q signed 4 November) are the newest measurements. The 9 November pricing supplement embeds a 31 December 2025 table; its later cover date does not make those values newer. Record.
- County contracts. Agenda, reported approval, adopted resolution, executed amendment and payment are separate states; Napa, Kane and Collin are not described as executed. Record.
- Partial feeds. Older or incomplete docket snapshots (Geisler, Anderson) do not show that later filings are absent; earlier reported entries stay in the queue rather than becoming confirmations. Record.
California litigation
Lara, III et al. v. County of Santa Barbara et al.
Grade CC.D. Cal. · 2:26-cv-13163 · event/document date · document(s) 1, 2, 3, 4 · reviewed 12 November 2026
A November 10 federal case-opening record names CFMG and Wellpath LLC separately. ECF 1 is the complaint; ECF 4 is an interested-party certificate. This is a new dual-entity research lead, distinct from Anderson in the same county.
| CFMG, Inc. | Named defendant in indexed case-opening record |
|---|---|
| Wellpath, LLC | Separately named defendant |
What this does not establish. Complaint and certificate not inspected; no claim elements, service, corporate control or liability established.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 1 and exhibits
- ECF 4 and responsive entity disclosures
- Complete current docket and service records
Sources and inspection limits
- Lara federal docket reproduction — C: third-party docket reproduction. November 10 case opening, named defendants and ECF 1–4; complaint not read.
Corinne Maryatt v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al.
Grade DNapa County Superior Court · 26CV001433 · event/document date · document(s) Joint submission: document number unverified · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 11 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The indexed California employment case is a priority acquisition because it names two California professional corporations and three separately named Wellpath-related companies. The underlying action was filed July 8; November 4 is an indexed submission date reported in the November 11 research, not a new lawsuit date.
| CFMG, Inc. | Secondary index names defendant |
|---|---|
| California Health and Recovery Solutions, P.C. | Secondary index names defendant |
| Wellpath LLC | Secondary index names defendant |
| Wellpath Management, Inc. | Secondary index names defendant |
| Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC | Secondary index names defendant |
What this does not establish. Full index access and the pleadings were unavailable. Legal theories, present party status, bankruptcy dispositions and common ownership are not verified and are not reported as such.
Next records to obtain.
- Official Napa register
- Operative complaint
- October dismissal/bankruptcy filings
- November 4 submission and signed orders
Sources and inspection limits
- Maryatt secondary case index — D: secondary search-index lead. Names located in indexed result; full page inaccessible. November 4 filing description carried from November 11 research, not an inspected pleading.
Montes Zepeda v. County of Stanislaus et al.
Grade C plus A for ECF 86E.D. Cal. · 2:25-cv-03299-JAM-AC · event/document date · document(s) 80, 81, October 21 minute entries, 85, 86, 87 · reviewed 12 November 2026
The 7 October dismissal (ECF 80) remains a historical event. A public court-feed reproduction reports 21 October reopening and minute entries and a 10 November answer (ECF 87); ECF 86, signed 22 October, extended a response deadline to 11 November. Current status needs a claim-by-claim, defendant-by-defendant reconciliation.
| CFMG, Inc. | Current claim/party status unresolved across orders |
|---|---|
| Wellpath entities | No current status inference from case title |
What this does not establish. The feed does not identify the answering parties or explain the reopening. An extension or reopening label does not itself establish vacatur of all dismissals or revival of every claim.
Next records to obtain.
- October 21 official minute orders
- ECF 80–87 complete sequence
- Operative complaint and ECF 87
- Count-by-defendant disposition matrix
Sources and inspection limits
- Montes Zepeda court-feed reproduction — C: third-party partial feed. Reports October 21 reopening/minute entries and November 10 ECF 87 answer. Does not supply order or answer contents.
- Montes Zepeda ECF 86 — A: court document reproduced. Signed October 22; response deadline November 11. Not proof ECF 80 was vacated.
Justin J. Goss et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo et al.
Grade CC.D. Cal. · 2:26-cv-04235-SB-RAO · event/document date · document(s) 77, 78, 79, 81, 83 · reviewed 12 November 2026
The public feed now runs through ECF 83, an 11 November order labelled as adding and terminating parties; it also lists ECF 81, an errata, on 9 November, after dismissal-related entries and an answer. The acquisition queue extends through ECF 83.
| CFMG | Previously separately named; effect of November entries unverified |
|---|---|
| Wellpath | Previously separately named; exact entity/status requires operative documents |
What this does not establish. Docket labels do not identify which party was removed or whether earlier dismissal labels refer to motions. Neither company is marked dismissed or active on the strength of this feed.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 77–83 including errata
- Operative amended complaint
- Current party list and all dispositive orders
Sources and inspection limits
- Goss court-feed reproduction — C: third-party partial feed. Through November 11 ECF 83 order/party-change label; affected parties and substantive text unverified.
Overfield et al. v. County of El Dorado et al. (legacy index: Wellpath Community Care, LLC)
Grade AE.D. Cal. · 2:24-cv-00199-TLN-AC · event/document date · document(s) 96; underlying motion 88 and joint statement 95 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 4 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 96, signed 30 October, grants CFMG protection from the additional financial discovery sought for the punitive-damages question — a defense-favorable result. The 4 November evidence ledger on this site remains the detailed account; this entry links to it rather than reporting a second ruling.
| CFMG, Inc. | Defendant; successful protective-order movant |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | Order describes the discharge and injunction for pre-petition claims; not an ordinary active merits defendant |
What this does not establish. Plaintiffs’ descriptions of fees and cash transfers are not judicial findings of illegality. The order is not a CPOM merits judgment and does not authorize publication of protected discovery. Signed October 30 is distinct from a November 2 feed date.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 95 with public attachments A–C
- ECF 31 confidentiality terms
- Lawfully public/authorized Lukasik transcript with context and errata
- Current operative party/claim map
Sources and inspection limits
- Overfield ECF 96 — A: signed court order reproduced. Signed October 30; PDF and final page inspected. Protective order for CFMG. Statements of litigants are attributed, not converted into findings.
- Overfield ECF 95 acquisition target — H: acquisition target, inaccessible. Direct court URL from November 4 atlas; retrieval unsuccessful. No claim to have acquired attachments or transcript.
Hernandez et al. v. County of Monterey et al.
Grade BN.D. Cal. · 5:13-cv-02354-BLF · event/document date · document(s) Administrator update November 9; no new ECF identified · reviewed 12 November 2026
The court-authorized administrator states in its 9 November update that second-round checks were mailed on 4 November. Those checks become void after 2 February 2027. The first-round checks, mailed 15 September, keep their separate 14 December 2026 void date. This replaces the anticipated mailing recorded on 1 November.
| CFMG, Inc. | Contempt-fund settlement obligor in administrator notice |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | Not established as settlement obligor by this notice |
What this does not establish. This is settlement administration, not a new liability decision, a new settlement approval or a reopening of the claim deadline. CFMG's contempt-fund settlement is not the same thing as every possible personal-injury claim.
Next records to obtain.
- Any subsequent administrator notice
- Court distribution reports when publicly filed
Sources and inspection limits
- Court-authorized Hernandez settlement administrator — B: court-authorized administrator. November 9 notice states second-round checks mailed November 4, void after February 2, 2027.
Nguyen et al. v. City of Santa Ana et al.
Grade CC.D. Cal.; Orange County Superior Court · 2:26-cv-13066; 30-2026-01592632-CU-CR-CJC · event/document date · document(s) 1–5 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 8 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The City removed the Orange County action to federal court on 6 November. The state and federal dockets are one case family, not two lawsuits. The source identifies CFMG separately from the City.
| CFMG | Named in reproduced defendant list |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | Not separately listed in reviewed case-opening caption |
What this does not establish. Removal is not a merits ruling, and 6 November is not established as the original filing date. Wellpath LLC is not added as a defendant on the strength of corporate branding.
Next records to obtain.
- Notice of removal and attached complaint
- State register
- Entity disclosures and service records
Sources and inspection limits
- Nguyen removal docket — C: third-party docket reproduction. Federal removal November 6; source state case and CFMG separately identified. Complaint/exhibits not inspected.
Cheslik v. Madera County Sheriff’s Department et al.
Grade AE.D. Cal. · 1:23-cv-01754-JLT-FJS · event/document date · document(s) 79; references 70,71,76 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 8 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 79 extends Wellpath LLC’s responsive-pleading deadline to December 4. The accompanying stipulation recounts October 15 authorization to amend, October 16 filing of the third amended complaint and October 26 service on Wellpath.
| Wellpath LLC | Named defendant with court-extended response deadline |
|---|---|
| CFMG | Not established as party by reviewed order |
What this does not establish. No finding of liability, bankruptcy-defense waiver or CFMG participation. The 2023 action is not a newly filed November lawsuit.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 71 operative complaint
- Wellpath response and bankruptcy position
- Any later deadline order
Sources and inspection limits
- Cheslik ECF 79 — A: signed court order reproduced. November 6 order; final page inspected; Wellpath LLC response due December 4.
Gamez v. County of Fresno et al.
Grade AE.D. Cal. · 1:26-cv-00297-KES-EPG · event/document date · document(s) 45 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 4 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 45 sets 16 November for initial disclosures — a procedural date, entered in the decision calendar.
| Wellpath LLC | Named in reviewed stipulation/order |
|---|---|
| CFMG | Not independently established as party by this order |
What this does not establish. Discovery scheduling is not an admission or a liability finding, and the date is not confirmation that disclosures were exchanged.
Next records to obtain.
- Later scheduling orders
- Operative complaint and entity disclosures
Sources and inspection limits
- Gamez ECF 45 — A: signed court order reproduced. November 2 order/PDF inspected; initial disclosures due November 16.
Oreglia et al. v. County of Placer et al.
Grade AE.D. Cal. · 2:25-cv-00959-JAM-CKD · event/document date · document(s) 58; references 53,54 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 8 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 58 extends the bill-of-costs deadline for CFMG and Diana McGinnis to 24 November. The order recites 20 October dismissal and judgment entries; the case stays with the defense results, not among active merits cases.
| CFMG, Inc. | Dismissed-party/postjudgment costs posture as recited |
|---|---|
| Diana McGinnis | Same costs-deadline order |
| Wellpath LLC | No separate party status established by CFMG branding |
What this does not establish. The costs extension does not revive claims. Earlier references to 19 October may reflect a signature-versus-entry difference; ECF 53–54 have to be reconciled before any date correction.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 53 and54 signature/entry dates
- Bill of costs or waiver
- Any appeal or postjudgment order
Sources and inspection limits
- Oreglia ECF 58 — A: signed court order reproduced. November 5 order/PDF inspected; costs deadline November 24. Recites October 20 dismissal/judgment entries.
Vickie Grayson v. County of Fresno
Grade DFresno County Superior Court · 22CECG01628 · event/document date · document(s) November 3 tentative; October 22 hospital tentative separate · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 11 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The 3 November tentative ruling concerns two physicians' demurrers to cross-complaints; the 22 October tentative concerns the hospital. They are separate tracks. The November tentative contemplates dismissal of the cross-claims against the physicians, not dismissal of the original plaintiff's claims against CFMG.
| CFMG, Inc. and specified clinicians | Cross-complainants in reproduced tentative |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | Described as nominal defendant in provider group |
| Two physician cross-defendants | Proposed successful demurrants, not verified final judgment |
What this does not establish. No adopted minute order or judgment was obtained. A tentative, even after the hearing date, is not automatically a final ruling.
Next records to obtain.
- Official adopted minute orders after both hearings
- Any judgments on cross-complaints
- Current main-action and cross-action party maps
Sources and inspection limits
- Grayson November 3 tentative reproduction — D: secondary reproduction of tentative. Physicians’ demurrers to cross-complaints; conditional November 5 oral argument. Not adoption or judgment.
National litigation
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al. (current order caption: Hill v. Canard et al.)
Grade AE.D. Ark. · 4:25-cv-01205-LPR-BBM · event/document date · document(s) 39; historical17 and31 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 8 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
Correction to an earlier research characterization: ECF 39 (5 November) denies interim injunctive relief without prejudice, but ECF 31, page 2, confirms that the claim against Wellpath Medical Corporation had already been dismissed. The historical docket attributes the party termination to ECF 17 on 22 April.
| Wellpath Medical Corporation / WellPath as named | Prior claim dismissed without prejudice; not shown restored by reviewed orders |
|---|---|
| Individual defendants | November injunction dispute proceeds in individual-defendant caption |
What this does not establish. The November injunction ruling is not proof that a Wellpath corporation remains an active defendant. The original case title is kept as an alias, not as a current party roster. The exact legal identity behind the pleaded name is not established.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 17 original
- Operative amended complaint and any later corporate reinstatement order
- Current complete docket
Sources and inspection limits
- Hill ECF 39 — A: signed court order reproduced. November 5 denial of TRO/preliminary injunction without prejudice. Signed page inspected.
- Hill ECF 31 — A: signed court order reproduced. June 30 order; page 2 recounts prior dismissal of Wellpath Medical Corporation. Used for party-status correction, not a new November holding.
- Hill historical party map — C: third-party docket reproduction. April 22 ECF 17 describes termination of WellPath; remaining listed defendants are individuals. Incomplete current docket.
Blackwell v. Wellpath LLC et al.
Grade AE.D. Wis. · 1:26-cv-00096 · event/document date · document(s) 42; motion36 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 9 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 42 grants the defendants summary judgment for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies and dismisses the entire action without prejudice — a defense result.
| Wellpath LLC | District-court action dismissed without prejudice |
|---|---|
| Individual medical defendants | Same action dismissed without prejudice |
What this does not establish. The court did not adjudicate the adequacy of medical care. A later appeal or new action is not ruled out; current appellate status was not established.
Next records to obtain.
- Judgment entry
- Any postjudgment motion or notice of appeal
Sources and inspection limits
- Blackwell ECF 42 — A: signed court order reproduced. November 3 exhaustion summary judgment; entire action dismissed without prejudice; final page inspected.
Terry Watson, as Administrator of the Estate of Antwan Cater v. Oneida County et al.
Grade A, historical evidence upgradeN.D.N.Y. · 9:25-cv-01601-AJB-DJS · event/document date · document(s) 44; references24,30,36,40,42,43 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 5 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
A historical comparator, now supported by the official order rather than a secondary lead: ECF 44 (11 May) names New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C. and the Wellpath Liquidating Trust separately and records their answers and cross-claims. The denied motion was brought by the county and officers.
| New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C. | Defendant identified by exact name in court order; had answered |
|---|---|
| Wellpath Liquidating Trust | Separate defendant; had answered |
| County/officers | Movants whose dismissal motion was denied |
What this does not establish. This is a May ruling examined for this update, not a new November event. A shorter index name omitting “Solutions” does not override the court's text. The decision is not a finding against the professional corporation or the Trust and does not certify present affiliation or current case status.
Next records to obtain.
- Current official docket
- PC/Trust answers and cross-claims
- Current operative complaint and any substitution/dismissal orders
Sources and inspection limits
- Watson ECF 44, official GovInfo — A: official court opinion. May 11 order, pp.2 and 22 visually inspected. Exact PC name includes Solutions; moving defendants were county/officers, not PC or Trust.
Geisler v. Wellpath LLC et al.
Grade CD. Mass.; transferred from S.D. Tex. · 1:26-cv-14785; prior4:25-cv-03335 · event/document date · document(s) 65 November6, 66 November9; earlier67–68 reports held · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 10 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The receiving-court feed confirms a reconsideration-labelled entry (ECF 65, 6 November) and an opposition (ECF 66, 9 November). Massachusetts and the earlier Texas transfer stage are one case family. Earlier references to ECF 67–68 remain acquisition leads because this retrieval did not show them.
| Wellpath LLC and other caption defendants | Actual post-transfer claim/party posture requires pleadings |
|---|
What this does not establish. No argument, motion target or new holding can be inferred from labels. The Texas transfer order is not a Massachusetts merits ruling. Geography does not establish that the Massachusetts professional corporation is a party.
Next records to obtain.
- ECF 65–68 and any ruling
- Transfer-in docket
- Current party disclosures
Sources and inspection limits
- Geisler receiving-court feed — C: third-party partial feed. This retrieval confirms ECF 65 November 6 and 66 November 9. Earlier reports of 67–68 not independently reacquired here.
Brown v. Wellpath LLC
Grade BS.D. Fla. · 0:26-cv-63169-RS · event/document date · document(s) Complaint document number not verified · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 11 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The official 12 November new-case register lists this action as filed 10 November, with a “Civil Rights: Jobs” category but a section 12182 ADA cause code. The exact claims are unresolved until the complaint is read.
| Wellpath LLC | Named defendant in official case-opening register |
|---|
What this does not establish. No employment relationship, discrimination, liability or connection to a professional corporation has been established without the complaint.
Next records to obtain.
- Complaint and civil cover sheet
- Corporate disclosure
- Service and response records
Sources and inspection limits
- Southern District of Florida official new-case register — B: official court register. As of November 12 lists Brown, 0:26-cv-63169-RS, filed November 10. Complaint not read; code/category mismatch preserved.
The bankruptcy family: three contested matters, one case
Angelo, Dunkley and the Liquidating Trust's tolling and claims entries are separate contested matters inside one bankruptcy — In re Wellpath SF Holdco, LLC, Bankr. S.D. Tex. No. 24-90566 — not three bankruptcies and not recoveries. Wellpath SF Holdco, Wellpath LLC, New WPCC Parent and the Liquidating Trust stay distinct.
Estate of Abby Angelo insurance-access dispute in In re Wellpath SF Holdco, LLC
Grade CBankr. S.D. Tex. · 24-90566; historical lead24-90533 · event/document date · document(s) 1955, 2061, 2064, 2065, 2074 · reviewed 12 November 2026
The November 12 docket table now identifies ECF 2074, the estate’s reply to the post-restructuring debtor’s supplemental response, with five exhibits. It follows November 9 insurance-related submissions, including ECF 2065, James Seitz’s second supplemental declaration. The previously reported sealing order concerns access to exhibits, not insurance entitlement.
| Wellpath SF Holdco, LLC | Post-restructuring debtor; opposing/response filings |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | Proposed nominal target for insurance access |
| New WPCC Parent LLC | Identified in insurance declarant’s job title, not adjudicated clinical controller |
| Estate of Abby Angelo | Moving creditor and claimant; filed the 12 November reply |
What this does not establish. The reply, its exhibits and the supplemental declaration were not obtained. Their arguments, and any coverage, indemnity, defense funding or right to sue, are not adjudicated. Sealed material is not sought or reconstructed.
Next records to obtain.
- Public ECF2074 and five exhibits
- Public2064–2065
- Signed2061 and underlying2022
- Any substantive ruling on1955
Sources and inspection limits
- Wellpath SF Holdco bankruptcy index — C: third-party bankruptcy docket reproduction. Latest table retrieved includes November 12 ECF 2074, November 11 ECF 2071 and November 9 ECF 2065; header and table dates differ. Not complete official docket.
- Second bankruptcy index — C/H: partial historical index. Returned older snapshot in this review; prior watch entries do not become inspected documents.
Amanda Dunkley insurance-access motion in In re Wellpath SF Holdco, LLC
Grade CBankr. S.D. Tex. · 24-90566 · event/document date · document(s) 2071 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 12 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
ECF 2071 is indexed as a second declaratory-judgment motion concerning liability and the right to pursue insurance proceeds, with four exhibits — a separate contested matter in the same bankruptcy, not a second bankruptcy or an approved recovery.
| Amanda Dunkley | Creditor/movant in indexed entry |
|---|---|
| Wellpath entities | Affected entities and requested relief require actual motion |
What this does not establish. The filing's existence is supported by a reproduction; its arguments, coverage and disposition are not. This creditor's motion is separate from the Angelo dispute.
Next records to obtain.
- Public2071 and exhibits
- Responses
- Signed disposition if any
Sources and inspection limits
- Wellpath SF Holdco bankruptcy index — C: third-party bankruptcy docket reproduction. Latest table retrieved includes November 12 ECF 2074, November 11 ECF 2071 and November 9 ECF 2065; header and table dates differ. Not complete official docket.
Wellpath Liquidating Trust tolling and omnibus-claims entries
Grade C/HBankr. S.D. Tex. · 24-90566 · event/document date · document(s) 2056, 2059, 2062–2063 November9 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 7 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
Carried forward with their original grades: a signed tolling arrangement reported on the docket on 6 November and an omnibus claims objection on 9 November. They belong to bankruptcy administration and the preservation of claims, not to liability findings or creditor distributions.
| Wellpath Liquidating Trust | Stipulating party and claims objector as previously indexed |
|---|---|
| Kristin Allred / Victoria Klein / Estate of Michael Doyle | Named parties in prior indexed tolling stipulation |
What this does not establish. The signed tolling instrument and the objection schedules were not acquired. No tolling end date is used, and no settlement of a separate case is inferred from overlapping names.
Next records to obtain.
- Public2056 and signed2059
- Public2062 and responsive orders
- Related-case nexus from actual instruments
Sources and inspection limits
- Second bankruptcy index — C/H: partial historical index. Returned older snapshot in this review; prior watch entries do not become inspected documents.
- Wellpath SF Holdco bankruptcy index — C: third-party bankruptcy docket reproduction. Latest table retrieved includes November 12 ECF 2074, November 11 ECF 2071 and November 9 ECF 2065; header and table dates differ. Not complete official docket.
Financial disclosure and California regulation
Prospect Capital: New WPCC Parent and Wellpath trust holdings
Grade ASEC issuer disclosure · Accession0001287032-26-000309 · event/document date · document(s) Form10-Q signedNovember4; measurementsSeptember30/June30 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 6 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The September 30 fair values in millions are: first-lien loan 23.204, preferred 15.438, common 26.559 and trust interest 7.586; combined 72.787. June 30 comparatives are 25.856,14.960,21.339 and 12.264; combined 74.419. The trust-interest mark fell 4.678 million, approximately 38.1%; the nontrust positions increased to 65.201 million from 62.155 million.
| New WPCC Parent, LLC | Issuer investment counterparty |
|---|---|
| Liquidating Trust of Wellpath Holdings, Inc. | Separate beneficial-interest investment |
| CFMG | No physician-share ownership determination in schedule |
What this does not establish. These are one investor’s fair-value estimates, not enterprise value, total trust assets, distributions or creditor recovery rates. The November 9 pricing supplement embeds a December 31, 2025 schedule; its later cover date does not make those measurements newer.
Next records to obtain.
- EDGAR submission header for exact filing timestamp
- Subsequent quarterly disclosure; no daily valuation inference
Sources and inspection limits
- Prospect September 30 10-Q — A: SEC issuer filing. Signed November 4; schedules at printed pp.20 and 47 compare September 30 and June 30. Values in thousands, fair-value column. EDGAR submission header not reacquired separately.
- November 9 pricing supplement with older table — A: SEC issuer filing. Cover dated November 9, but the embedded investment schedule is dated December 31, 2025; its older values do not replace the newer September 30 measurements.
| Investment | 30 June 2026 | 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| New WPCC Parent first-lien loan | 25.856 | 23.204 |
| Preferred interests | 14.960 | 15.438 |
| Common interests | 21.339 | 26.559 |
| Wellpath liquidation-trust interest | 12.264 | 7.586 |
| Combined | 74.419 | 72.787 |
The trust-interest mark fell $4.678 million, about 38.1%; the non-trust positions rose to $65.201 million from $62.155 million. No conclusion about ownership of CFMG's physician shares can be drawn from these investments.
OHCA material-change regulations: effective-date integration
Grade ACalifornia HCAI/OAL · 22 CCR97431–97442 · event/document date · document(s) OAL approvalOctober2; effectiveNovember2 · reviewed 12 November 2026
HCAI's regulations page confirms that the amended material-change and pre-transaction review regulations took effect on 2 November. This site recorded the effective date on 2 November; this entry links the related pages rather than announcing it again.
| MSOs and other noticing entities | General regulatory categories, transaction-specific applicability required |
|---|---|
| CFMG/Wellpath | No company-specific enforcement disposition established here |
What this does not establish. AB 1415’s January 1, 2026 statutory effective date is distinct from the November 2 regulatory date. These rules concern transaction notice/review, not proof of a CPOM violation or a finding that any particular CFMG transaction required an unfiled notice.
Next records to obtain.
- Applicable transaction documents and dates before case-specific analysis
- Current approved regulatory text for any detailed legal exposition
Sources and inspection limits
- HCAI current regulations — A: official regulator publication. 22 CCR 97431–97442 amendments approved October 2, effective November 2. General framework, not a company-specific enforcement result.
- AB 1415 regulator FAQ — A: official regulator publication. Law effective January 1, 2026; new noticing-entity categories include MSOs. Older prospective “Spring” language on this page is superseded by the current regulations page.
County contracts
Del Norte County CFMG amendment 3
Grade D; outside-window underlying eventDel Norte County Board of Supervisors · Reportedagreement2026-205 · event/document date · document(s) Thirdamendment · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 5 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
A secondary meeting reproduction reports approval of added CalAIM and LVN services and annual base compensation of $1,681,825.28, up from $1,584,574.28, with 0.60 FTE staffing. The event (27 October) predates this review window and is recorded as newly acquired history.
| CFMG | Reported contracting party; executed instrument not read |
|---|
What this does not establish. This is not a new November vote. Approval, the 8% collection-fee provision reported earlier, payment triggers and execution require the county's own documents. A percentage administrative fee is not labelled unlawful without the actual terms and a legal analysis.
Next records to obtain.
- Official adoptedminutes
- Executedthirdamendment
- CalAIMgo-liveconditions and fee provision
Sources and inspection limits
- Del Norte meeting reproduction — D: secondary meeting reproduction. October 27 event is outside review window; newly acquired evidence may be a dated historical supplement. Official executed amendment/minutes not read.
- Del Norte contract chronology — D: secondary packet summary. Reported annual compensation and LVN increment. Agenda summaries do not show unlawful fee sharing or execution.
Napa County Amendment 5 and public identity language
Grade B; outside-window contextNapa County Board of Supervisors · File26-1634;Agreement190201B · event/document date · document(s) Amendment5agenda · reviewed 12 November 2026
The official agenda describes CFMG “doing business as Wellpath LLC,” an extension to 30 June 2027 and $985,600 in fiscal impact. The returned legislative record remains Agenda Ready with no final action. It is recorded as an example of public contracting language and as an approval still to verify.
| CFMG, Inc. | Named counterparty in county wording |
|---|---|
| Wellpath LLC | County uses dba wording; legal equivalence not proved |
What this does not establish. County shorthand is not a merger, a registered assumed name or a shareholder record. The amount is the agenda's fiscal impact, not necessarily annual compensation. An October agenda is not a verified November amendment.
Next records to obtain.
- Adoptedminutes
- Executedagreement/signaturepages
- Assumed-name and corporate-registry records if identity is analyzed
Sources and inspection limits
- Napa County File 26-1634 — B: official county agenda. October 13 agenda, still Agenda Ready/no final action in returned record. Uses CFMG doing business as Wellpath LLC. This is county wording, not merger or legal identity proof.
Kane County Wellpath renewal
Grade B/H: final action unverifiedKane County Board · Resolution26-556 · event/document date · document(s) 26-556 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 10 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
The official meeting index lists the one-year renewal item (Resolution 26-556). Earlier research recorded a term of 1 December 2026 – 30 November 2027, a 3.6% increase and a $4,782,095.83 annual base. A secondary report of a vote stays attributed; official final action and execution were not established.
| Wellpath LLC | Proposed contractor in previously reviewed item |
|---|
What this does not establish. The item page could not be re-opened. The amount and terms are earlier-source data held for verification, not newly authenticated approved compensation.
Next records to obtain.
- Adoptedresolution and rollcall
- Executedextension
- Officialitemfinancialterms
Sources and inspection limits
- Kane November 10 official meeting register — B/H: official register indexed; item access limited. 26-556 shown; official final action not established. Amount/terms carried from prior research pending re-acquisition.
- Kane Resolution 26-556 target — H: prior official source, inaccessible this run. A secondary report of a vote is not verified execution.
Collin County proposed Amendment 5
Grade H: future proposal; prior sourceCollin County Commissioners Court · RFP2022-061;AI-61122 · event/document date · document(s) ProposedAmendment5 · reviewed 12 November 2026 · previously noted in a watch on 11 November 2026 (not itself independent proof)
Earlier research identified a 16 November agenda proposal for revised annual compensation of $18,570,464.39, inflation adjustments and juvenile mental-health staffing. It is a future decision; an earlier favorable Sheriff assessment will be recorded as contrary evidence once its memo is re-acquired.
| Wellpath LLC | Proposed contractor in the earlier official-agenda review |
|---|
What this does not establish. November 16 is outside this review window and in the future. The official page was inaccessible in this run. No approval, execution, retrospective effective date or payment is established.
Next records to obtain.
- OfficialNovember16agenda andmemo
- Amendmenttext
- Subsequentadoptedaction andsignedagreement
Sources and inspection limits
- Collin Amendment 5 target — H: prior official agenda, inaccessible this run. November 11 ledger reported November 16 proposal; exact financial terms await fresh official acquisition, not approved.
The historical eighteen
The roster of the amended bankruptcy order is a historical search universe, not a certification that eighteen entities remain affiliated. Exact names and legal forms must be checked against the cited historical instrument and current state records before any legal-identity use.
| Historical name | Records in this review | Coverage note |
|---|---|---|
| California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. | Lara, III et al., Corinne Maryatt, Overfield et al., Hernandez et al. | Multiple California records above; current affiliation and governance must be tied to dated instruments, not a blanket roster inference. |
| California Health and Recovery Solutions, P.C. | Corinne Maryatt | Maryatt secondary index is a concrete dual-PC acquisition lead; operative documents not read. |
| CCS-Kastre Nevada, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Emerald Healthcare Services, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Grand Prairie Healthcare Services, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Retain any dated exit/separation evidence and historical comparators; no new in-window primary change authenticated here. |
| Great Peak Dental, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Great Peak Healthcare Services, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Massachusetts Correctional Healthcare Services, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| McDonald Dental Associates, P.A. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Midwest Center, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| New Garden Healthcare Services, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services, P.C. | Terry Watson, as Administrator of the Estate of Antwan Cater | Watson official May 11 order confirms exact name and separate Trust defendant; current affiliation not established. |
| Old Empire Dental, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Old Empire Psychology, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Southwest Correctional Medical Group, PLLC | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Southeast Correctional Medical Group, PLLC | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Stringfellow Correctional Dental, P.A. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
| Zenova Physicians, P.C. | none promoted to a new verified event | Historical search seed retained. No new in-window primary entity-specific change authenticated in this bounded search; not a no-litigation or current-affiliation certification. |
Outstanding records
The research queue in its working form: for each matter, the next document to obtain and the reading rule that applies until it is read. A backlog, not a report that every case was fully searched or remains active; a no-hit search is not a no-case result.
- Wright — E.D. Cal. 2:24-cv-02505. Obtain current docket and preserve the entity-specific discharge ruling; do not undo dismissal because clinicians remain.
- Vizgaudis-Gomez — Sacramento 26 CV 011196;E.D. Cal. 2:26-cv-02403. Obtain post-remand state register; one family, remand not joint-employer finding.
- J.S./Slaven — E.D. Cal. 1:23-cv-01070. September 30 conference was scheduled; outcome not established. Obtain minute entry, notice of settlement/dismissal and any minors-compromise order.
- Anderson/Santa Barbara — C.D. Cal. 2:26-cv-10199. Prior Nov 5 report lists Nov 4 ECF 27–29; returned feed stops Oct 28. Reacquire documents and show-cause disposition; do not infer no later filings.
- Williams — E.D. Cal. 1:26-cv-01793. Prior Nov 6 report lists ECF 38 Nov 5 answer. Obtain actual answer and filers; default set-aside is procedural not merits.
- Fahrni — E.D. Cal. 1:23-cv-01265. Reconcile pending/post-bankruptcy party map with current operative pleadings.
- Hall — E.D. Cal. 1:11-cv-02047. Keep in county-defendant remedial litigation unless operative record makes CFMG a party.
- Miles — E.D. Cal. 1:22-cv-01105. Current official docket and correct legal defendant name.
- Ross — D. Or. 6:21-cv-01576. Preserve September 29 ECF 114 as historical; acquire later docket and party-specific status.
- Morabito — S.D.N.Y. 7:22-cv-06853. Use Southern, not Northern District; acquire post-September 30 ECF 125 record.
- Penelton — S.D. Ind. 2:25-cv-00229. Acquire post-October 16 ECF 53 dismissal/substitution implementation.
- Boxley — E.D. Pa. 2:24-cv-05473. Wellpath entity dismissal must not be reversed by continued clinician litigation.
- Hoffman — D. Nev. 2:25-cv-00577-RFB-EJY. April 1 ECF 52 trust substitution reported Nov 9; reacquire signed instrument and current docket; historical comparator not new November order.
- Ivory — E.D. Ark. 4:26-cv-01219. Prior Nov 7 research identified Nov 5 filing. Exact WellPath corporate identity and complaint unresolved.
- Morris — Texas 5:23-cv-00128; district to verify. November 12 ECF 69 scheduling-feed lead only; identify exact court and original order before adding.
- Smith/Santa Cruz — N.D. Cal. 5:21-cv-00421. Historical comparator; recheck latest disposition, do not count active.
Governance and affiliation. Prioritize dated CFMG share registers/transfers, director/officer instruments, stock-succession restrictions, MSA amendments/termination provisions, alternative-MSO selection rights, bank authority, reserved physician decisions and executed county signature pages. No new authenticated document in those categories was obtained here. Use lawful public or authorized sources only. Preserve contrary evidence and possible separation/exit records for historical affiliates.
Coverage statement. Exact-name/public-web searches covered the historical roster and selected nationwide cases. There was no authenticated national PACER party-name census or complete fifty-state docket search. California state portals and public indexes may be incomplete. A no-hit search is not a no-case result. No blanket current active status, current affiliation or absence of later filings is assigned.
Dates in this record
| Date | Matter and status | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Nava — scheduled deadline under ECF 48 | Specified CFMG defendants answer or otherwise respond; later compliance not verified. | |
| Cheslik — scheduled deadline under ECF 79 | Wellpath LLC responsive pleading; later compliance not verified. | |
| Hernandez first distribution — check date | First-distribution checks become void after this date. | |
| Hernandez second distribution — check date | Second-distribution checks become void after this date. |
Where the record was updated
- Current Developments — the 15-day ledger, newest first, and the Montes Zepeda qualification
- California Litigation as a Control Laboratory — entity categories for the new records
- Article 060 — the casebook by evidentiary function
- The Eighteen and Article 078 — the Maryatt lead
- Article 051 — the completed second mailing
- Insurance and indemnity — Angelo, Dunkley and the Trust entries
- County contract atlas — Del Norte, Napa, Kane and Collin by evidence state
- Source register — the review's sources, classes and access limits
← Current developments · 4 November Overfield record · 2 November National Watch · 1 November reconciliation · Investigation home
Sources
Numbered sources cite the National Watch text above. Each record brief carries its own source links, evidence class and inspection limits.
- Hernandez authorized settlement administrator; event November 4, notice November 9, checked November 12. PRIMARY ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE. www.montereyjailsettlement.com · register ID I01
- Nava v County of Calaveras, E.D. Cal. 2:25-cv-03613-JAM-SCR, ECF 48, signed November 2. JUDICIAL ORDER, public reproduction. docs.justia.com · register ID I02
- Cheslik v Madera County Sheriff's Department, E.D. Cal. 1:23-cv-01754-JLT-FJS, ECF 79, signed November 6. JUDICIAL ORDER, public reproduction. docs.justia.com · register ID I03
- Overfield, E.D. Cal. 2:24-cv-00199-TLN-AC, ECF 96, signed October 30 (public indexes report entry November 2). JUDICIAL ORDER, public reproduction. docs.justia.com · register ID I04
- Wellpath SF Holdco, Bankr. S.D. Tex. 24-90566, docket index to November 11. SECONDARY INDEX, not underlying documents. www.bkalerts.com · register ID I06
- Wellpath SF Holdco corroborating index, to November 9. SECONDARY INDEX. www.inforuptcy.com · register ID I07
- Montes Zepeda v County of Stanislaus, 2:25-cv-03299. SECONDARY FEED INDEX. casemagic.ai · register ID I14
- Hall public repository, class counsel. PRIMARY FOR WHAT COUNSEL POSTED; incomplete court docket. prisonlaw.com · register ID I15